The Rolex GMT-Master II 116113, a watch that seamlessly blends sporty functionality with luxurious aesthetics, holds a unique place in the brand's history. This two-tone model, with its striking combination of yellow gold and stainless steel, captivated watch enthusiasts for years. However, a subtle but significant detail in its dial design, a temporary departure from tradition, adds an intriguing layer to its story. This article will explore the 116113 in detail, touching upon its design features, the controversial dial change, and its place within the broader context of the GMT-Master II lineage, particularly in relation to models featuring the Cerachrom bezel, such as the 116713.
The 116113 is instantly recognizable for its iconic two-tone Oyster bracelet, expertly crafted from a blend of 18k yellow gold and stainless steel. This combination is a hallmark of Rolex's luxury sports watches, offering a balance between robust durability and opulent elegance. The case, also a blend of yellow gold and stainless steel, houses the self-winding calibre 3186 movement, a testament to Rolex's dedication to precision and reliability. This movement, known for its accuracy and power reserve, is a significant contributor to the watch's overall appeal.
One of the most defining characteristics of the 116113 is its bidirectional rotatable bezel, featuring the iconic GMT function. This bezel allows the wearer to track a second time zone with remarkable ease. While the 116713 models, which are frequently compared and contrasted with the 116113, utilize the innovative Cerachrom bezel made of virtually scratch-proof ceramic, the 116113 employs a more traditional, albeit still highly durable, aluminum insert. This difference, though seemingly minor, contributes to the distinct character of each model.
The Dial Controversy: A Departure and a Return
While the case and bracelet of the 116113 remain constant, a fascinating detail regarding its dial design warrants further investigation. Initially, Rolex opted for a departure from the traditional sunburst dial, choosing instead a flat, even shade of blue. This decision, intended to complement the blue aluminum bezel insert, was met with a mixed reception from collectors and enthusiasts. The sunburst dial, a long-standing feature of many Rolex models, was widely appreciated for its depth and play of light, qualities absent in the flat blue dial. The subtle textural differences of the sunburst dial provided a more visually engaging experience.
The market reaction to this design choice was telling. Many felt the flat blue dial lacked the visual richness and character expected from a Rolex GMT-Master II. This feedback, coupled with the enduring popularity of the sunburst dial, led Rolex to reverse course within a relatively short period. The company swiftly returned to the traditional sunburst dial, effectively acknowledging the preferences of its clientele and demonstrating its responsiveness to market sentiment. This episode serves as a valuable case study in the interplay between design choices, market reception, and the evolution of iconic timepieces.
current url：https://xzpbkb.k443s.com/products/rolex-116113-1896